Russell McAdams v. Cir ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        SEP 22 2021
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RUSSELL T. McADAMS,                             No. 20-72611
    Petitioner-Appellant,           Tax Ct. No. 19702-19
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
    REVENUE,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    Appeal from a Decision of the
    United States Tax Court
    Submitted September 14, 2021**
    Before:      PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
    Russell T. McAdams appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying his
    post-judgment motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C.
    § 7482(a). We review for an abuse of discretion. Parkinson v. Comm’r, 
    647 F.2d 875
    , 876 (9th Cir. 1981). We affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying McAdams’s post-
    judgment motion for reconsideration because McAdams failed to demonstrate any
    basis for such relief. See 
    id.
     (“The Tax Court’s denial of a motion for
    reconsideration will not be overturned on appeal absent a clear abuse of
    discretion.”); see also Abatti v. Comm’r, 
    859 F.2d 115
    , 118 (9th Cir. 1988) (a Tax
    Court cannot reopen a case after a final decision except in the event of fraud on the
    court or mutual mistake).
    We do not consider McAdams’s contentions regarding the Tax Court’s
    original decision because McAdams failed to file a timely notice of appeal as to
    that decision. See 26 U.S.C. § 7483 (notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days
    of judgment); Fed. R. App. P. 13(a)(1)(B); Tax Ct. R. 161, 162 (post-judgment
    motions for reconsideration or to vacate or revise a decision must be filed within
    30 days of the decision); Nordvik v. Comm’r, 
    67 F.3d 1489
    , 1493 n. 5 (9th Cir.
    1995) (“[S]uccessive motions asserting the same grounds cannot be tacked
    together to extend the time for filing an appeal.”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                  20-72611
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-72611

Filed Date: 9/22/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/22/2021