United States v. Enriqueta Navarrete-Zavala ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    NOV 28 2017
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No.    16-50183
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                D.C. No.
    3:15-cr-00596-BEN-1
    v.
    ENRIQUETA NAVARRETE-ZAVALA,                      MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted August 10, 2017
    Pasadena, California
    Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    1. The district court increased Navarrete-Zavala’s sentence under U.S.S.G.
    § 2D1.1(b)(12) for maintaining a stash house. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(12), cmt.
    n.17 (2015). Under the circumstances of this case, the district court did not err by
    imposing this enhancement.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    2. Even if the district court mistakenly applied the enhancement from
    § 2S1.1(b)(2)(B) as a specific offense characteristic while calculating Navarrete-
    Zavala’s sentence under the drug distribution guideline § 2D1.1, any error was
    harmless. See United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 
    631 F.3d 1028
    , 1030–31 (9th
    Cir. 2011); United States v. Ali, 
    620 F.3d 1062
    , 1074 (9th Cir. 2010). Had the
    district court calculated Navarrete-Zavala’s Guidelines range in the manner she
    urges, it would have resulted in the same offense level used to calculate the
    Guidelines range. See U.S.S.G. § 3D1.3(b).
    3. On the facts of this case, the district court abused its discretion by
    denying Navarrete-Zavala’s request to seal the transcripts from her sentencing
    hearings and the parties’ joint request to seal the government’s sentencing
    memorandum. See United States v. Doe, 
    870 F.3d 991
    , 994 (9th Cir. 2017).
    Navarrete-Zavala’s sentence is AFFIRMED. The case is REMANDED for
    the district court to seal the government’s sentencing memorandum and the
    transcripts from Navarrete-Zavala’s sentencing hearings.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-50183

Judges: Reinhardt, Kozinski, Christen

Filed Date: 11/28/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024