United States v. Jorge Guerra-Esparza , 553 F. App'x 688 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              JAN 24 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-10470
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01947-ROS
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JORGE GUERRA-ESPARZA,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted January 21, 2014**
    Before:        CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    Jorge Guerra-Esparza appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
    for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
    § 846; and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting, in
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(ii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have
    jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    Guerra-Esparza contends that the district court committed legal error when it
    denied him safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). Notwithstanding the
    court’s alleged misstatements regarding the requirements for obtaining safety-
    valve relief, the record reflects that the court agreed with the government’s
    determination that Guerra-Esparza had not truthfully and fully provided the
    government with all of the information he had concerning the offense. Because the
    record supports this determination, the district court did not clearly err in denying
    relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); United Mejia-Pimental, 
    477 F.3d 1100
    , 1103
    (9th Cir. 2007).
    Because the district court lacked discretion to sentence Guerra-Esparza
    below the statutory mandatory minimum, we do not reach his remaining
    contentions of sentencing error.
    Guerra-Esparza’s stipulated motion to supplement the record is granted.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    12-10470
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-10470

Citation Numbers: 553 F. App'x 688

Judges: Canby, Silverman, Paez

Filed Date: 1/24/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024