United States v. Jesus Meneses-Lopez , 550 F. App'x 395 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            DEC 18 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-10387
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:11-cr-02270-ROS
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JESUS MENESES-LOPEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted December 17, 2013**
    Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    Jesus Meneses-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
    reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction
    under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Meneses-Lopez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing
    to recognize its discretion to vary downward from the Guideline range based upon
    policy grounds under Kimbrough v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 85
    (2007). The record
    belies this contention. The district court recognized, but chose not to exercise, its
    Kimbrough discretion to vary from the Guidelines. See United States v. Ayala-
    Nicanor, 
    659 F.3d 744
    , 752-53 (9th Cir. 2011).
    Meneses-Lopez also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable
    in light of the age of his 1998 felony conviction and other mitigating factors. The
    district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Meneses-Lopez’s sentence.
    See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007). The sentence at the bottom of
    the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
    sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Meneses-
    Lopez’s overall criminal history and the need for deterrence and protection of the
    public. See 
    id. AFFIRMED. 2
                                       12-10387
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-10387

Citation Numbers: 550 F. App'x 395

Judges: Goodwin, Wallace, Graber

Filed Date: 12/18/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024