Jermaura Wright v. Carolyn Colvin ( 2016 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 04 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JERMAURA WRIGHT, a.k.a. Jermaura No. 14-56782
Paige Wright,
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-04385-JVS-AJW
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Jermaura Wright appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment reversing
the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision affirming the suspension and
termination of her Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an
abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to remand for further administrative
proceedings, Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1173 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in remanding the action for
further administrative proceedings because “there is conflicting evidence, and not
all essential factual issues have been resolved[.]” Treichler v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec.
Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1101 (9th Cir. 2014) (explaining when remand for further
administrative proceedings is appropriate).
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 14-56782