Charde Evans v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    AUG 15 2016
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    CHARDE EVANS, on behalf of herself,              No. 14-16566
    and all others similarly situated,
    D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-
    Plaintiff - Appellant,             VCF
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted July 8, 2016
    San Francisco, California
    Before: SILVERMAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges and ANELLO,** District
    Judge.
    Charde Evans appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment
    regarding her claims for “waiting time” penalties pursuant to Nevada Revised
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge for
    the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
    Statutes §§ 608.040 and 608.050. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
    and review de novo. See Szajer v. City of Los Angeles, 
    632 F.3d 607
    , 610 (9th Cir.
    2011). We reverse and remand.
    Wal-Mart employed Evans as an hourly stocker and cashier. At times,
    Evans worked more than one eight-hour shift within a twenty-four-hour period or
    more than forty hours in a workweek, entitling her to overtime pay under Nevada
    law. After Evans filed suit, Wal-Mart settled her claims for unpaid overtime with
    the Nevada Labor Commissioner. Although the Commissioner’s order does not
    address Evans’s claims for waiting time penalties, the district court granted
    summary judgment on grounds that waiting time penalties are only available when
    an employer fails to timely pay the “contractually agreed upon wage,” not statutory
    overtime pay.
    The Labor Commissioner’s order does not reference waiting time penalties,
    and therefore does not dispose of Evans’s waiting time penalty claims. We
    conclude that overtime pay is a form of wages under Nevada law. See Nev. Rev.
    Stat. § 608.012 (defining wages as “[t]he amount which an employer agrees to pay
    an employee for the time the employee has worked, computed in proportion to
    time”). Overtime pay is also a form of compensation under § 608.040. See Nev.
    2                                     14-16566
    Rev. Stat. § 608.040 (providing for waiting time penalties for failure to pay wages
    or compensation). Wal-Mart conceded at oral argument that Evans was employed
    pursuant to an oral contract of employment, so Evans is also entitled to seek
    waiting time penalties under § 608.050. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.050 (providing
    for waiting time penalties “in the sum agreed upon in the contract of
    employment”).
    Appellant’s motion for judicial notice is DENIED.
    REVERSED AND REMANDED.
    3                                     14-16566
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-16566

Judges: Silverman, Nguyen, Anello

Filed Date: 8/15/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024