United States v. Zachary Beck , 491 F. App'x 855 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                DEC 07 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-30251
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:10-cr-05553-RJB-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ZACHARY BECK,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Washington
    Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted November 8, 2012**
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and TUCKER, District
    Judge.***
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    ***
    The Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker, United States District Judge
    for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
    Defendant Zachary Beck appeals his conviction and his sentence after a
    bench trial on the basis that his waiver of his jury-trial right was not knowing,
    voluntary, or intelligent. Beck also appeals his conviction for conspiracy to violate
    civil rights on the ground that the government failed to prove an agreement to
    violate the victim’s civil rights. We affirm.
    Beck’s jury-trial waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. The district
    court conducted an “in-depth” colloquy with Beck that adequately addressed the
    four elements of his jury-trial right, including his right to personally participate in
    jury selection. United States v. Christensen, 
    18 F.3d 822
    , 826 (9th Cir. 1994); see
    United States v. Cochran, 
    770 F.2d 850
    , 853 (9th Cir. 1985).
    Sufficient evidence supported the district court’s conclusion that Beck
    conspired to violate the victim’s civil rights, including strong circumstantial
    evidence that Beck and his associates “acted with a common goal” in attacking the
    victim. United States v. Corona-Verbera, 
    509 F.3d 1105
    , 1117 (9th Cir. 2007).
    AFFIRMED.
    Page 2 of 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-30251

Citation Numbers: 491 F. App'x 855

Judges: Fletcher, Fisher, Tucker

Filed Date: 12/7/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024