Luis Lemus Rivera v. William Barr ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                               NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       DEC 13 2019
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    LUIS ROBERTO LEMUS RIVERA, AKA                  No.    15-70582
    Luis Lemusrivera,
    Agency No. A206-408-429
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM*
    WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted December 11, 2019**
    Before:      WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Luis Roberto Lemus Rivera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
    from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum,
    withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in
    part the petition for review.
    In his opening brief, Lemus Rivera does not challenge the agency’s
    dispositive bases for denying his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and
    relief under CAT. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 
    706 F.3d 1072
    , 1079-80 (9th Cir.
    2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are
    waived).
    We do not consider the materials Lemus Rivera references in his opening
    brief that are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 
    79 F.3d 955
    ,
    963-64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
    We lack jurisdiction to consider Lemus Rivera’s contentions that he
    established a nexus between the harm he experienced or fears in El Salvador and a
    political opinion because he did not raise this claim before the BIA. See Barron v.
    Ashcroft, 
    358 F.3d 674
    , 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review
    claims not presented to the agency).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                   15-70582
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-70582

Filed Date: 12/13/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2019