United States v. Miguel Garcia ( 2019 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30065
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:15-cr-06049-EFS-21
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MIGUEL REYES GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 11, 2019**
Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Reyes Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 180-month sentence for conspiracy to
distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Reyes Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Reyes Garcia the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 19-30065