Darryl Hawkins v. Louis Winn, Jr. , 610 F. App'x 649 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         JUL 27 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    DARRYL L. HAWKINS,                              No. 14-15201
    Petitioner - Appellant,           D.C. No. 4:13-cv-00049-BGM
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    LOUIS W. WINN, Jr.,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    Bruce G. Macdonald, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
    Submitted July 21, 2015***
    Before:      CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    Federal prisoner Darryl L. Hawkins appeals pro se from the district court’s
    judgment denying his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     habeas corpus petition. We have
    jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de novo the denial of a section
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge.
    ***
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    2241 petition, see Tablada v. Thomas, 
    533 F.3d 800
    , 805 (9th Cir. 2008), and we
    affirm.
    Hawkins was arrested on November 13, 1993. He acknowledges that he
    has received credit towards his federal sentence for the time between his arrest on
    November 13, 1993, and October 31, 1995, the day before his state sentence
    commenced. However, he argues that he is also entitled to credit towards his
    federal sentence for the period between the commencement of his state sentence on
    November 1, 1995, and the expiration of his state sentence on June 5, 2005,
    because he was allegedly in primary federal custody during that time. Contrary to
    this argument, the record reflects that Hawkins was in primary state custody and
    received credit against his state sentence for this time period. He is, therefore, not
    entitled to any additional federal credit. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3585
    (b); United States v.
    Wilson, 
    503 U.S. 329
    , 337 (1992) (defendant may not receive “double credit for his
    detention time”).
    Hawkins’ motion for judicial notice and motion for an evidentiary hearing
    are denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    14-15201
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15201

Citation Numbers: 610 F. App'x 649

Judges: Canby, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 7/27/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024