United States v. Jusaino-Gomez , 611 F. App'x 421 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              JUL 28 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-50468
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00425-R
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    RYAN DEON WILLIAMS GOMEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted July 21, 2015**
    Before:        CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    Ryan Deon Williams Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for conspiracy to
    commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
    record. We have provided Gomez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
    brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. The court
    has considered Gomez’s pro se letter filed on May 8, 2015.
    Gomez waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an
    appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. Gomez also waived the
    right to appeal six specified issues related to his sentence. Our independent review
    of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no
    arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Gomez’s plea or any
    sentencing issue outside the scope of the appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to
    those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal
    waiver. See United States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 988 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                   13-50468
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-50468

Citation Numbers: 611 F. App'x 421

Judges: Canby, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 7/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024