United States v. Gonzalo Jusaino-Gomez ( 2015 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 28 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 13-10331
13-10332
Plaintiff - Appellee,
D.C. Nos. 4:04-cr-01796-DCB
v. 4:11-cr-02515-DCB
GONZALO JUSAINO-GOMEZ, a.k.a. MEMORANDUM*
Jesus Gonzalo Jusaino-Gomez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 21, 2015**
Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Gonzalo Jusaino-Gomez appeals his jury-trial
conviction and 92-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and 12-month consecutive
sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(1967), Jusaino-Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Jusaino-Gomez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. We, therefore, affirm Jusaino-
Gomez’s conviction and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10332, and the revocation of
supervised release and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10331.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 13-10331 & 13-10332