United States v. Alfonso Mendoza Trujillo ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              JUL 28 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-10285
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00242-JGZ
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ALFONSO MENDOZA TRUJILLO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding**
    Submitted July 21, 2015***
    Before:        CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    Alfonso Mendoza Trujillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry after
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable John C. Coughenour, Senior United States District
    Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.
    ***
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R App. P. 34(a)(2).
    deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), Mendoza Trujillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
    no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We
    have provided Mendoza Trujillo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
    No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
    Mendoza Trujillo waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80
    (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
    States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
    the appeal. See 
    id. at 988.
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                   14-10285
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-10285

Judges: Canby, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 7/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024