Martha Mendoza v. Loretta E. Lynch , 601 F. App'x 509 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            APR 28 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MARTHA MENDOZA,                                  No. 08-71183
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A089-521-262
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Department of Homeland Security
    Submitted April 22, 2015**
    Before:        GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    Martha Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an
    order of the Department of Homeland Security reinstating her prior expedited order
    of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    questions of law. Duran Gonzales v. DHS, 
    508 F.3d 1227
    , 1232 (9th Cir. 2007).
    We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
    Mendoza’s challenge to the reinstatement order is foreclosed by this court’s
    decision in Duran Gonzales, as Mendoza concedes she filed her application for a
    waiver of inadmissibility well after Duran Gonzales became controlling law in this
    circuit. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a)(2), (i)(2)(A) (alien must be admissible to adjust
    status); Duran 
    Gonzales, 508 F.3d at 1242
    (“[P]laintiffs as a matter of law are not
    eligible to adjust their status because they are ineligible to receive I-212 waivers
    [of inadmissibility].”)
    We lack jurisdiction to consider Mendoza’s contention that her case
    warrants a favorable exercise of prosecutorial discretion. See Vilchiz-Soto v.
    Holder, 
    688 F.3d 642
    , 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).
    Mendoza’s request to hold her case in abeyance pending a decision in
    Duran Gonzales v. DHS, 
    659 F.3d 930
    (9th Cir. 2011) is denied as moot.
    Mendoza’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                     08-71183
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-71183

Citation Numbers: 601 F. App'x 509

Judges: Goodwin, Bybee, Christen

Filed Date: 4/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024