William Herron v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc. , 676 F. App'x 639 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    FEB 13 2017
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    WILLIAM HERRON,                                  No.   14-16134
    Plaintiff-Appellant,               D.C. No.
    3:13-cv-00075-HDM-VPC
    v.
    PERI & SONS FARMS, INC.,                         MEMORANDUM*
    Defendant-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Nevada
    Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 9, 2017**
    San Francisco, California
    Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    William Herron appeals the district court’s summary judgment in his action
    alleging that Peri & Sons Farms, Inc., discriminated against him by terminating his
    employment as a maintenance mechanic and failing to accommodate his bad back
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    in violation of Americans with Disabilities Act. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de novo. Samper v. Providence St. Vincent Med. Ctr.,
    
    675 F.3d 1233
    , 1235 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.
    The district court properly granted summary judgment because Herron failed
    to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he was “‘a qualified
    individual able to perform the essential functions of the job with reasonable
    accommodation.’” 
    Id. at 1237
     (citation omitted) (setting out requirements for a
    prima facie case of failure to accommodate); see also 
    id.
     (to determine whether an
    individual is qualified, “‘[t]he court first examines whether the individual satisfies
    the requisite skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the
    position’” (citation omitted)); Snead v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 
    237 F.3d 1080
    , 1087 (9th Cir. 2001) (same requirements for a prima facie case of disability
    discrimination). The record shows that the maintenance mechanic position for
    which Herron was hired required a certificate of completion or equivalent from a
    certified trade school. It is undisputed that Herron lacked a certificate of
    completion from a certified trade school, and Herron provided no evidence that his
    various other expired certificates demonstrated equivalent training.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-16134

Citation Numbers: 676 F. App'x 639

Judges: Goodwin, Leavy, Silverman

Filed Date: 2/13/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024