-
129 F.3d 518
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8611
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juri RIPINSKY, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
J. Malcolm KINGSTON, Defendant-Appellant.Nos. 94-50486, 94-50488.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.Nov. 13, 1997.
Before: WALLACE, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING
1The opinion in the above case, filed on March 28, 1997 [109 F.3d 1436], is amended as follows:
2At slip op. 3500, lines 3-4 [109 F.3d at 1440], delete "for locating the properties" and replace with "to compensate fictitious real estate brokerages which."
3At slip op. 3501, line 2 [109 F.3d at 1440, right column, line 15], change "he" to "Kingston."
4At slip op. 3506, second full paragraph (starting "Because Ripinsky"), line 4 [109 F.3d at 1443], delete from sentence starting "Our recent" to end of the paragraph; add the next paragraph to the second full paragraph; change the citation of Turman to "United States v. Turman, 122 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir.1997) (Turman )".
5At slip op. 3507 [109 F.3d at 1443], change the citation after the indented quote to "Id., 122 F.3d at 1170 (citation omitted)."
6At slip op. 3507 [109 F.3d at 1443], third line after indented quote, insert the following after "Stein.": "See United States v. Golb, 69 F.3d 1417, 1428 (9th Cir.1995) (reviewing Stein error for plain error), cert. denied, U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1369, 134 L.Ed.2d 534 (1996)."
7At slip op. 3510, line 4 [109 F.3d at 1444, 1445], delete last sentence and citation in the carryover paragraph ("There was no ... at 878."); add the following sentence, "The law at the time of trial was not 'settled and clearly contrary to the law at the time of appeal.' Turman, 122 F.3d at 1170 (citation omitted)."
8At slip op. 3510, first full paragraph, line 5 [109 F.3d at 1445], change Turman citation to "Turman, 122 F.3d at 1171."
9At slip op. 3512, first full paragraph, lines 13-20 [109 F.3d at 1446], delete last sentence and citation following: "Moreover, the government ... authority to depart)."
10With the above amendments, the panel as constituted above has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc.
11The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
12The petitions for rehearing are denied, and the suggestions fr rehearing en banc are rejected.
Document Info
Docket Number: 94-50486, 94-50488
Judges: Wallace, Kozinski, Rymer
Filed Date: 11/13/1997
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024