United States v. Brandan Grilho ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 23 2023
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    22-10076
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00053-DKW-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    BRANDAN GRILHO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Hawaii
    Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 14, 2023**
    Before:      FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    Brandan Grilho appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
    guilty-plea convictions and aggregate 300-month sentence for conspiracy to
    distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii), 846; and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    drug trafficking crime, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (c)(1)(A). Pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Grilho’s counsel has filed a brief
    stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
    counsel of record. We have provided Grilho the opportunity to file a pro se
    supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
    filed.
    Grilho waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
    independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80
    (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
    States v. Watson, 
    582 F.3d 974
    , 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
    the appeal. See 
    id. at 988
    .
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    DISMISSED.
    2                                    22-10076
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-10076

Filed Date: 2/23/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/23/2023