United States v. Adilia Bermudez ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            DEC 20 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-50544
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00673-GHK-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    ADILIA BERMUDEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    George H. King, Chief Judge, Presiding
    Submitted December 17, 2013**
    Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    Adilia Bermudez appeals the 60-month sentence imposed following her
    guilty-plea conviction for two counts of bank fraud, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 1344
    . We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Bermudez contends that the district court committed a Guidelines
    calculation error when it applied a two-level enhancement for abuse of trust under
    U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. We review for plain error because Bermudez forfeited the
    challenge by failing to raise it at the time of sentencing. See United States v.
    Guzman-Mata, 
    579 F.3d 1065
    , 1068 (9th Cir. 2009).
    Any error in applying the enhancement was not plain because the record
    suggests that Bermudez, as Accounting Controller of Mel-Jen, Inc., had
    professional discretion and was “subject to significantly less supervision than
    employees whose responsibilities are primarily non-discretionary in nature.”
    U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 cmt. n.1. Moreover, Bermudez’s position of trust “contributed in
    some significant way to facilitating the commission or concealment of the
    offense,” id., because her role enabled her to conceal her offense by preparing
    misleading daily financial reports and by ensuring that questions about the
    fraudulent checks were routed through her.
    We need not consider the issue of the alleged waiver.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                       12-50544
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-50544

Judges: Goodwin, Wallace, Graber

Filed Date: 12/20/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024