Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General , 340 F.3d 786 ( 2003 )
Menu:
-
340 F.3d 786
Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.No. 01-56320.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 13, 2003.
1Charles M. Sevilla, Esq., Law Office, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
2Brentford Ferriera, Matthew G. Monforton, Esq., District Attorney-Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
3Cliff Gardner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.
ORDER
4Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Notes:
1Judge Fisher was recused
Document Info
Docket Number: 01-56320
Citation Numbers: 340 F.3d 786, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7300, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9352, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16616
Filed Date: 8/13/2003
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024