United States v. Robert James Poole , 806 F.2d 853 ( 1986 )


Menu:
  • 806 F.2d 853

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee,
    v.
    Robert James POOLE, Respondent/Appellant.

    CA No. 84-5195.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Ninth Circuit.

    Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1985.
    Decided July 14, 1986.
    Order for Publication Dec. 17, 1986.

    1

    Duane J. Deskins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff/appellee.

    2

    Brad Brian, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent/appellant.

    3

    Prior Report: 794 F.2d 462.

    4

    Before SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges and SOLOMON* District Judge.

    ORDER

    5

    The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

    6

    The panel has voted to amend the opinion as follows. Delete the body of the section entitled "A. Standard of Review" on page 465 of 794 F.2d, and substitute the following:

    7

    The determination whether a defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation is essentially factual, and is reviewable under the "clearly erroneous" standard. United States v. Wauneka, 770 F.2d 1434, 1438 (9th Cir.1985) (citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824, 105 S. Ct. 101, 83 L. Ed. 2d 46 (1984)); United States v. Combs, 762 F.2d 1343, 1348 (9th Cir.1985).

    8

    In the 5th and 6th lines from the bottom of col. 1, page 467, delete the words "then applicable."

    9

    In the first full paragraph, col. 2, page 467, change the next-to-last sentence to read: "We conclude that the district court clearly erred in ruling that the questioning about name, date of birth and place of birth did not constitute interrogation."

    10

    Add a citation to United States v. Perez, 776 F.2d 797, 799 (9th Cir.1986), on page 466, col. 1, 15 lines from the bottom, after "see also " and before the citation to United States v. Booth.

    11

    The full court has been advised of the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of the court has voted against it. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

    12

    The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

    *

    The Honorable Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Document Info

Docket Number: CA 84-5195

Citation Numbers: 806 F.2d 853, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34924

Judges: Skopil, Canby, Solomon

Filed Date: 12/17/1986

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2024

Cited By (41)

United States v. Enrique Carmargo, United States of America ... , 32 F.3d 572 ( 1994 )

United States v. Brigido Zapien , 861 F.3d 971 ( 2017 )

MacArthur v. San Juan County , 391 F. Supp. 2d 895 ( 2005 )

Vann v. Kempthorne , 467 F. Supp. 2d 56 ( 2006 )

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Karuk Tribe ... , 260 F.3d 1071 ( 2001 )

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western ... , 400 F.3d 774 ( 2005 )

Garcia v. Akwesasne Housing Authority , 105 F. Supp. 2d 12 ( 2000 )

98-cal-daily-op-serv-5880-98-daily-journal-dar-8235-minidoka , 154 F.3d 924 ( 1998 )

Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally Jewell , 637 F. App'x 976 ( 2015 )

97-cal-daily-op-serv-8139-97-daily-journal-dar-13152-state-of , 127 F.3d 897 ( 1997 )

Casino Pauma v. NLRB , 888 F.3d 1066 ( 2018 )

Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Farley , 115 F.3d 1498 ( 1997 )

United States v. Hugo Rincon , 984 F.2d 1003 ( 1993 )

Nippon Miniature Bearing Corporation v. George J. Weise, ... , 230 F.3d 1131 ( 2000 )

Muscogee Creek Indian Freedmen Band, Inc. v. Zinke ( 2019 )

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Company v. Vaughn ( 2007 )

richard-neal-schowengerdt-v-general-dynamics-corporation-cw-kessel-kd , 91 A.L.R. Fed. 201 ( 1987 )

United States v. Park Place Association ( 2009 )

E. v. v. Eugene Robinson, Jr. , 906 F.3d 1082 ( 2018 )

United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-Sandoval , 894 F.2d 1043 ( 1990 )

View All Citing Opinions »