Redmond v. Sulphur Mountain Land & Livestock Co. (In Re Redmond) ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             FEB 22 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    In re: MAUREEN C. REDMOND; JOHN                  No. 11-55827
    A. REDMOND,
    D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02552-CJC
    Debtors,
    MEMORANDUM *
    JOHN A. REDMOND; MAUREEN C.
    REDMOND,
    Appellants,
    v.
    SULPHUR MOUNTAIN LAND AND
    LIVESTOCK CO., LLC,
    Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted February 15, 2013
    Pasadena, California
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Before: BERZON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, Senior District
    Judge.**
    John and Maureen Redmond appeal from the district court’s order affirming
    a decision by the bankruptcy court to issue terminating sanctions and enter
    judgment against them. The bankruptcy court put the Redmonds on notice that
    failure to comply with its October 27, 2009, order granting Sulphur Mountain’s
    motion to compel would result in terminating sanctions. The Redmonds thereafter
    failed to produce all responsive documents by the court-ordered deadline, redacted
    others without court approval, and refused to answer questions at their depositions
    without having been so instructed by their counsel. The court’s decision to issue
    terminating sanctions based on this conduct, combined with the Redmonds’ long
    history of discovery obstruction and repeated failures to comply with prior court
    orders, was not an abuse of discretion. See Conn. General Life Ins. Co. v. New
    Images of Beverly Hills, 
    482 F.3d 1091
    , 1096 (9th Cir. 2007). Although the
    Redmonds challenge several aspects of the October 27, 2009, order, they have
    identified no error that would undermine the validity of the court’s decision to
    issue terminating sanctions.
    AFFIRMED.
    **
    The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge for
    the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-55827

Judges: Berzon, Watford, Rakoff

Filed Date: 2/22/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024