-
426 F.2d 302
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
David Valadez RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.No. 24370.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 10, 1970.
David Marcus, Paul J. Geragos, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District judge.1
PER CURIAM:
1The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
2The points on appeal in this narcotics case concern the sufficiency of the evidence of delivery, the admissibility of evidence of statements of a co-defendant, no conspiracy being charged, and the jury instructions.
3The evidence as to delivery was conflicting. The jury was justified in accepting the government's version. The statements of the co-defendant meet the tests for admissibility as enunciated in Fuentes v. United States, 9 Cir., 283 F.2d 537.
4The jury instructions were never objected to in the trial court. Finding no error in them, we need not consider whether they were plain error.
1The Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Document Info
Docket Number: 24370
Citation Numbers: 426 F.2d 302, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9851
Judges: Chambers, Trask, Jameson
Filed Date: 4/10/1970
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/4/2024