Roxana Maribel Nolasco-Alvarez v. Eric H. Holder Jr. ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           JAN 19 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                    U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ROXANA MARIBEL NOLASCO-                          No. 08-74114
    ALVAREZ,
    Agency No. A098-559-156
    Petitioner,
    v.                                            MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    **
    Submitted January 11, 2010
    Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    Roxana Maribel Nolasco-Alvarez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
    petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissal of her
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    jlf/Inventory
    appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for withholding of
    removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). The BIA noted
    that petitioner was not eligible for asylum based on her failure to file a timely
    asylum application. The BIA denied petitioner’s applications for withholding of
    removal and CAT based on her failure to establish persecution or the likelihood of
    torture in El Salvador.
    Petitioner contends that the BIA erred by denying her application for asylum
    based on her failure to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future
    persecution. Petitioner alleged fear of gang activity in El Salvador.
    Petitioner does not challenge the BIA’s holding that she had failed to file a
    timely asylum application, or that an exception to the timeliness requirement
    applied, and therefore petitioner has waived any arguments concerning whether she
    merited asylum relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 
    94 F.3d 1256
    , 1259 (9th Cir.
    1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are
    waived). Petitioner raises no issues before this court concerning the BIA’s denial
    of her applications for withholding of removal or relief under the Convention
    Against Torture. Petitioner, therefore, fails to raise any issues properly before this
    court.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    jlf/Inventory                                2                                      08-74114
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-74114

Judges: Beezer, Trott, Bybee

Filed Date: 1/19/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024