Laura Sanchez-Parra v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 516 F. App'x 646 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            APR 22 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    LAURA CESAREA SANCHEZ-PARRA,                     No. 12-70370
    a.k.a. Laura Sanchez,
    Agency No. A036-730-828
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted April 16, 2013 **
    Before:        CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
    Laura Cesarea Sanchez-Parra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro
    se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her
    appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Ramirez-Villalpando v.
    Holder, 
    645 F.3d 1035
    , 1038 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the petition for review.
    The BIA correctly determined that Sanchez-Parra’s 2010 conviction for
    petty theft with priors, in violation of California Penal Code §§ 484 and 666,
    constituted an aggravated felony theft offense under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1101
    (a)(43)(G),
    where the record of conviction shows that she pleaded guilty to theft of personal
    property and was sentenced to two years imprisonment. See United States v.
    Rivera, 
    658 F.3d 1073
    , 1076-78 (9th Cir. 2011) (a conviction for petty theft with
    priors under California Penal Code §§ 484 and 666 constitutes an aggravated
    felony theft offense where the record of conviction shows defendant pleaded guilty
    to theft of personal property and received a sentence of at least one year); see also
    Ramirez-Villalpando, 
    645 F.3d at 1040-41
     (using an abstract of judgment in
    combination with the charging document to establish that a conviction was for a
    removable offense).
    Because Sanchez-Parra was convicted of an aggravated felony, the BIA
    correctly concluded that she is removable, see 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(2)(A)(iii), and
    statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                      12-70370
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-70370

Citation Numbers: 516 F. App'x 646

Judges: Canby, Ikuta, Watford

Filed Date: 4/22/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023