David Lopez-Gomez v. Jefferson Sessions , 690 F. App'x 487 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                               NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        APR 26 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    DAVID LOPEZ-GOMEZ,                              No.    15-73182
    Petitioner,                     Agency No. A200-248-498
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
    General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted April 11, 2017**
    Before:      GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    David Lopez-Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
    the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s order of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and we
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    review de novo questions of law. Najmabadi v. Holder, 
    597 F.3d 983
    , 986 (9th
    Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
    Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Lopez-Gomez did
    not provide sufficient evidence to establish that he lawfully entered the United
    States. See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1240.8
    (c); Murphy v. INS, 
    54 F.3d 605
    , 608-09 (9th Cir.
    1995) (alien bears burden of showing time, place, and manner of entry after the
    government has established alienage); Carrillo-Gonzalez v. INS, 
    353 F.3d 1077
    ,
    1079 (9th Cir. 2003) (statements by counsel are not evidence). The BIA did not err
    in referring to Lopez-Gomez’s mother’s declaration.
    We lack jurisdiction to consider Lopez-Gomez’s unexhausted contentions
    regarding the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. See Tijani v. Holder, 
    628 F.3d 1071
    , 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).
    We grant the motion to withdraw as counsel of record (Docket Entry No. 28)
    filed by Bethany C. Danks.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                   15-73182
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-73182

Citation Numbers: 690 F. App'x 487

Judges: Gould, Clifton, Hurwitz

Filed Date: 4/26/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024