Western World Insurance Compan v. County of Hawaii , 357 F. App'x 795 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              NOV 23 2009
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE                          No. 08-16462
    COMPANY,
    D.C. No. 1:05-cv-00742-DAE-
    Plaintiff - Appellant,              LEK
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    COUNTY OF HAWAII,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Hawaii
    David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted October 15, 2009
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Before: BEEZER, GRABER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    Insurer Western World Insurance Company (“Western World”) appeals
    from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the County of
    Hawaii on the issue of Western World’s duty to defend the County of Hawaii in
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    two pending state court suits. We review de novo the district court’s grant of
    summary judgment. Burlington Ins. Co. v. Oceanic Design & Constr., Inc., 
    383 F.3d 940
    , 944 (9th Cir. 2004). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
    affirm the district court’s declaratory judgment.
    The facts of this case are known to the parties and are not repeated here.
    The district court correctly determined that Western World has a duty to
    defend the County of Hawaii in the pending state court suits. So long as “the
    pleadings have alleged claims for relief which fall within the terms for coverage,”
    there is a duty to defend whenever there is the mere possibility that coverage
    exists. Hawaiian Holiday Macadamia Nut Co. v. Indus. Indem. Co., 
    872 P.2d 230
    ,
    233 (Haw. 1994). The policy covers the off-duty actions of the County of
    Hawaii’s emergency personnel, as well as the post-mortem handling of human
    bodies and resulting emotional distress damages. There is at least a possibility that
    some of these covered claims may not be subject to administrative exhaustion
    requirements under section 671-12 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. Western World
    has a duty to defend.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-16462

Citation Numbers: 357 F. App'x 795

Judges: Beezer, Graber, Fisher

Filed Date: 11/23/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024