-
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NEHEMIAH ROBINSON, No. 10-56885 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00161-H-BLM v. MEMORANDUM * T. CATLETT, Sergeant; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, AND BYBEE, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Nehemiah Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983action alleging that defendants delayed assigning him to a lower bunk, confiscated his * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cane, denied him pain medication, and retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Nunes v. Ashcroft,
375 F.3d 805, 807 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson’s post-judgment motion because Robinson failed to show any newly discovered evidence, intervening change in controlling law, clear error, or manifest injustice. See
id. at 807-08(setting forth grounds justifying reconsideration). Robinson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. 2 10-56885
Document Info
Docket Number: 10-56885
Citation Numbers: 470 F. App'x 546
Filed Date: 2/29/2012
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023