United States v. Renee Gomez ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             FEB 26 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 13-30086
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00108-EFS
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    RENEE GOMEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Washington
    Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted February 18, 2014**
    Before:        ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
    Renee Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
    120-month sentence imposed following her jury-trial conviction for drug crimes
    involving methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1), 846, 856, and
    860. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Gomez challenges the district court’s denial of safety-valve relief. We
    review de novo the district court’s interpretation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (f), and we
    review for clear error its factual determination that a defendant is ineligible for
    safety-valve relief. See United States v. Mejia-Pimental, 
    477 F.3d 1100
    , 1103 (9th
    Cir. 2007). Contrary to Gomez’s contention, the district court made its own
    determination, separate from the jury’s finding of guilt, that Gomez’s safety-valve
    statement was not truthful. See United States v. Sherpa, 
    110 F.3d 656
    , 662 (9th
    Cir. 1996). Furthermore, the court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. See United
    States v. Orm Hieng, 
    679 F.3d 1131
    , 1144-45 (9th Cir.) (upholding denial of
    safety-valve relief where the defendant denied knowing anything about a marijuana
    growing operation, but evidence in the record suggested otherwise), cert. denied,
    
    133 S. Ct. 775
     (2012). Therefore, Gomez is not entitled to relief from the statutory
    mandatory minimum sentence. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (f)(5).
    Gomez’s motion to take judicial notice is denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     13-30086
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-30086

Judges: Alarcón, O'Scannlain, Fernandez

Filed Date: 2/26/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024