Alex Guadarrama v. Sasan Chadorbaff ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       NOV 22 2019
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ALEX GUADARRAMA; CHRISTIAN                      No.    18-56041
    GUADARRAMA,
    D.C. No. 8:17-cv-00645-DOC-JDE
    Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM*
    SASAN CHADORBAFF, DBA Western
    Motors,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted November 18, 2019**
    Before:      CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    Sasan Chadorbaff, DBA Western Motors, appeals pro se from the district
    court’s order denying his motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
    60(b) to vacate entry of default and default judgment. We have jurisdiction under
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss.
    On February 28, 2019, this court ordered appellant to order the transcript or
    digital audio recording of the district court’s June 4, 2018 hearing. See Docket
    Entry No. 6. To date, appellant has failed to comply with the order. Due to
    appellant’s failure to include the relevant transcript in the record on appeal, we
    dismiss this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) (if appellant intends to challenge
    a finding or conclusion as unsupported by the evidence, appellant must include in
    the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to that finding or conclusion);
    Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 
    924 F.2d 167
    , 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing
    appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide relevant trial transcripts); Portland
    Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Advocates for Life, Inc., 
    877 F.2d 787
    , 789
    (9th Cir. 1989) (declining to consider argument that district court erred due to
    failure to provide transcript of contempt hearing).
    DISMISSED.
    2                                       18-56041
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-56041

Filed Date: 11/22/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/22/2019