Curlin Pennick, III v. Joe Williamson , 576 F. App'x 672 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                         MAY 29 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    CURLIN PENNICK, III,                             No. 13-35120
    Plaintiff - Appellant,            D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05971-RBL
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JOE WILLIAMSON, Cook, Stafford
    Creek Correctional Center,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Washington
    Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted May 13, 2014**
    Before:        CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
    Washington state prisoner Curlin Pennick, III, appeals pro se from the
    district court’s summary judgment in his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action alleging that the
    denial of kosher meals for over two days during Passover violated his First
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . We review de
    novo. Garcia v. County of Merced, 
    639 F.3d 1206
    , 1208 (9th Cir. 2011). We
    affirm.
    The district court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of
    qualified immunity because there was no genuine dispute of material fact as to
    whether defendant Williamson reasonably relied on the Passover meals-list which
    mistakenly omitted Pennick. See Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer, 
    301 F.3d 1043
    , 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that a prison official may be entitled to
    qualified immunity where he has a reasonable, but mistaken, belief about the facts
    or about what the law requires in a given situation); see also Hunter v. Bryant, 
    502 U.S. 224
    , 229 (1991) (per curiam) (“The qualified immunity standard ‘gives ample
    room for mistaken judgments’ by protecting ‘all but the plainly incompetent or
    those who knowingly violate the law.’” (citation omitted)).
    Pennick’s motion to supplement the record on appeal, filed on June 10,
    2013, is denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                   13-35120
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-35120

Citation Numbers: 576 F. App'x 672

Judges: Clifton, Bea, Watford

Filed Date: 5/29/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024