Hector Robles-Rojas v. Loretta E. Lynch , 609 F. App'x 460 ( 2015 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 02 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HECTOR ROBLES-ROJAS, No. 13-73060
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-150-282
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 22, 2015 **
Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Hector Robles-Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s order of removal, and denying his motion to accept a
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
late-filed appeal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in
part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Robles-Rojas has waived any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive
determinations that his appeal was untimely and he had not presented evidence
sufficient to warrant the BIA’s considering the appeal by certification. See Tijani
v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[W]e generally will not take up
arguments not raised in an alien’s opening brief before this court.”).
We lack jurisdiction to review Robles-Rojas’s remaining unexhausted
contentions. See id. (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not
presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
2 13-73060