Bd of Trustees Nw Metal Crafts v. Sweed MacHinery Inc. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION                         FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       JUL 21 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE                         No. 13-35947
    NORTHWEST METAL CRAFTS TRUST
    FUND,                                            D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01676-MAT
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    MEMORANDUM*
    v.
    SWEED MACHINERY INC., an Oregon
    corporation,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Washington
    Mary A. Theiler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted July 9, 2015
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: NGUYEN and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges and ZOUHARY,** District
    Judge.
    Sweed Machinery Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary
    judgment in favor of the Board of Trustees of the Northwest Metal Crafts Trust
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Jack Zouhary, District Judge for the U.S. District
    Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
    Fund. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . Reviewing de novo,
    Nw. Adm’rs, Inc. v. Albertson’s, Inc., 
    104 F.3d 253
    , 255 (9th Cir. 1996), we affirm.
    Assuming, without deciding, that the 2007 collective bargaining agreement
    (“CBA”) is ambiguous, we agree with the district court that extrinsic evidence
    establishes that Sweed was required to make contributions to the Trust Fund in the
    month following an employee’s termination, transfer to a non-union position, or
    opt-out. See Ariz. Laborers v. Conquer Cartage Co., 
    753 F.2d 1512
    , 1518 n.9
    (9th Cir. 1985). The Board’s uncontradicted evidence of industry practice
    regarding the reporting of employees’ hours to the Trust Fund, coupled with
    evidence that eligibility for benefits depends on the hours worked by an employee
    in previous months, supports the district court’s conclusion that the Board’s
    interpretation of the CBA is the only one that is consistent with the intent of the
    parties. Accordingly, the district court correctly granted summary judgment in
    favor of the Board. See 
    id.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-35947

Judges: Nguyen, Friedland, Zouhary

Filed Date: 7/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024