Ruben Hernandez Corona v. Eric Holder ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            OCT 31 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RUBEN HERNANDEZ CORONA,                          No. 09-73927
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A095-760-798
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted October 25, 2011 **
    Before:        TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    Ruben Hernandez Corona, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    .
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    We review de novo questions of law, Nunez-Reyes v. Holder, 
    646 F.3d 684
    , 688
    (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc), and we deny the petition for review.
    Hernandez Corona’s violation of the terms of his grant of deferred entry of
    judgment under 
    Cal. Penal Code § 1000
     et seq. would have rendered him ineligible
    for a disposition under the Federal First Offender Act had his crime been
    prosecuted in federal court. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3607
    (a) (allowing for dismissal of
    proceedings, either during or at the end of a period of probation, “if the person has
    not violated a condition of his probation”). Accordingly, the subsequent
    expungement of Hernandez Corona’s conviction under 
    Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4
    does not eliminate its immigration consequences. See Estrada v. Holder, 
    560 F.3d 1039
    , 1042 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Nunez-Reyes, 
    646 F.3d at 713
     (“[P]ersons who
    received the benefit of a state expungement law were not subject to deportation as
    long as they could have received the benefit of the FFOA if they had been
    prosecuted under federal law.”) (emphasis in original) (citation and quotations
    omitted).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    09-73927
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-73927

Judges: Trott, Gould, Rawlinson

Filed Date: 10/31/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024