Baez Paredes v. Holder , 459 F. App'x 599 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            NOV 22 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JOSE RAMIRO BAEZ PAREDES,                        No. 06-74525
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A095-185-666
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    November 21, 2011 **
    Before:        TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    Jose Ramiro Baez Paredes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
    for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
    motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction
    under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 
    400 F.3d 785
    , 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny
    the petition for review.
    The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Baez Paredes’s motion
    to reopen on the ground that he failed to establish prejudice from the errors of his
    former counsel. See Ray v. Gonzales, 
    439 F.3d 582
    , 587 (9th Cir. 2006)
    (presumption of prejudice arising from counsel’s failure to file a timely appeal is
    rebutted when petitioner cannot “demonstrate plausible grounds for relief”).
    Contrary to Baez Paredes’s contention, his conviction for carrying a loaded firearm
    under 
    Cal. Penal Code § 12031
    (a)(1) constituted a firearm offense under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(2)(C) that rendered him ineligible for cancellation of removal. See
    8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C); Gil v. Holder, 
    651 F.3d 1000
    , 1004 (9th Cir. 2011)
    (“[T]he generic offenses listed in § 1227(a)(2)(C) (such as carrying or possessing a
    firearm) should be interpreted as broadly as possible, so as to cover firearms
    offenses of any type.”) (citation and quotations omitted).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                      06-74525
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-74525

Citation Numbers: 459 F. App'x 599

Judges: Tashima, Berzon, Tallman

Filed Date: 11/22/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024