United States v. Jaime Garcia , 471 F. App'x 737 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                                 MAR 13 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 11-50163
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00440-SJO
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    JAIME GARCIA, a.k.a. Cisco, a.k.a.
    Sisco, a.k.a. Thumper,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 6, 2012 **
    Before:        B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Jaime Garcia appeals from the 296-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841
    (a)(1) and 846.1
    Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Garcia’s counsel has
    filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
    as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro
    se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
    filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
    However, we remand for the district court to conform the written judgment
    to the oral pronouncement of sentence with respect to special condition of
    supervised release number nine. Specifically, on remand the district court shall
    add to the written judgment the exception regarding the homes of family members
    announced at sentencing. See United States v. Allen, 
    157 F.3d 661
    , 668 (9th Cir.
    1998). Additionally, in light of United States v. Johnson, 
    626 F.3d 1085
    , 1091 (9th
    Cir. 2010), we remand with instructions to strike the language in special condition
    of supervised release number eight that Garcia may not associate with “persons
    associated with the Pacoima gang.”
    1
    The written judgment incorrectly indicated that Garcia pleaded not guilty.
    2                                   11-50163
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
    3                       11-50163
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-50163

Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 737

Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima

Filed Date: 3/13/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024