United States v. Rudy Wahchumwah ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              MAR 29 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 08-30476
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 2:08-CR-02016-WFN-1
    v.
    ORDER *
    RUDY LEE WAHCHUMWAH,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Washington
    Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Senior District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted October 14, 2009
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: CUDAHY **, RAWLINSON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    Rudy Lee Wahchumwah was charged with, and convicted of, failing to
    register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
    (SORNA). After we affirmed his conviction in a memorandum disposition, see
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior Circuit Judge for the
    Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
    United States v. Wahchumwah, 409 Fed. App’x 130, 132 (9th Cir. 2010),
    Wahchumwah filed a petition for rehearing and a motion to dismiss the indictment.
    The motion to dismiss was predicated on our opinion in United States v. Valverde,
    
    628 F.3d 1159
     (9th Cir. 2010), in which we held that SORNA was not applicable
    until August 1, 2008 for those individuals whose convictions predated the
    enactment of SORNA. See 
    id. at 1160
    .
    Wahchumwah’s conviction for a sex offense predated the enactment of
    SORNA and his failure to register occurred prior to August 1, 2008. Because
    SORNA did not apply to Wahchumwah prior to August 1, 2008, his indictment for
    a violation of SORNA’s registration requirements was invalid.
    We hereby grant Wahchumwah’s motion to dismiss the indictment, vacate
    our prior disposition, and remand this case to the district court for dismissal of the
    indictment against Wahchumwah. This action renders the petition for rehearing
    moot.
    Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Lack of Subject Matter
    Jurisdiction filed on January 4, 2011, is GRANTED. The prior disposition, filed
    on December 8, 2010, is VACATED. This case is REMANDED to the district
    court for Dismissal of the Indictment.
    2                                     08-30476
    The Petition of Appellant for Rehearing With Suggestion for Rehearing En
    Banc, filed on December 16, 2010, is DENIED as moot.
    3                                 08-30476
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-30476

Judges: Rawlinson, Callahan

Filed Date: 3/29/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024