Juan MacHic Salayon v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 474 F. App'x 684 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUL 23 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    JUAN A. MACHIC SALAYON, a.k.a.                   No. 09-73898
    Jose Sacayon Sanchez,
    Agency No. A075-304-234
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted July 17, 2012 **
    Before:        SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    Juan A. Machic Salayon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
    from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We
    deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
    The BIA found that Salayon failed to reasonably challenge the bases for the
    IJ’s denial of his applications for relief from removal and dismissed his appeal.
    Salayon does not contend the BIA erred in dismissing his appeal on this basis. See
    Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 
    94 F.3d 1256
    , 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not
    supported by argument are deemed waived). Accordingly, we deny the petition as
    to Salayon’s asylum and withholding of removal claims.
    We lack jurisdiction to review Salayon’s unexhausted claim that the IJ
    violated his due process rights by failing to fully develop the record. See Tall v.
    Mukasey, 
    517 F.3d 1115
    , 1120 (9th Cir. 2008).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
    2                                    09-73898
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-73898

Citation Numbers: 474 F. App'x 684

Filed Date: 7/23/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023