Santiago Vargas-Navarro v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 479 F. App'x 129 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           SEP 17 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    SANTIAGO VARGAS-NAVARRO,                          No. 08-72781
    Petitioner,                        Agency No. A095-734-369
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted September 10, 2012 **
    Before:        WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Santiago Vargas-Navarro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
    from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review de novo questions of law. Mendoza-Mazariegos v.
    Mukasey, 
    509 F.3d 1074
    , 1079 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.
    The BIA did not err in concluding that the IJ did not deprive Vargas-Navarro
    of his right to counsel. The record indicates that Vargas-Navarro knowingly and
    voluntarily waived his right to counsel at his removal hearing. See 
    id.
     (valid
    waiver occurs where IJ specifically inquires whether petitioner wishes to proceed
    without counsel and receives a knowing and voluntary response).
    Even if the circumstances of Vargas-Navarro’s apprehension constituted a
    violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment, the BIA correctly concluded
    that his admissions at his hearing provided an independent basis for his removal.
    See Magallanes-Damian v. INS, 
    783 F.2d 931
    , 934 (9th Cir. 1986) (even if
    interrogation and arrest involved violations of Fourth Amendment rights, “they
    would not prevent reliance by the Board on petitioners’ voluntary admission of
    illegal entry at the subsequent deportation hearing” (citation omitted)).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                     08-72781
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-72781

Citation Numbers: 479 F. App'x 129

Judges: Wardlaw, Clifton, Smith

Filed Date: 9/17/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024