Belinski v. Holder , 389 F. App'x 613 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUL 22 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    VLADIMIR B. BELINSKI; SVETLANA                   No. 06-73761
    B. BELINSKI; ANGELINA V.
    BELINSKI; VLADIMIR V. BELINSKI;                  Agency Nos. A078-668-643
    YULIA V. BELINSKI; DIANNA V.                                A078-668-644
    BELINSKI; DENNIS V. BELINSKI,                               A078-668-645
    A078-668-646
    Petitioners,                                  A078-668-647
    A078-668-648
    v.                                                        A078-668-649
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    MEMORANDUM *
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted July 15, 2010 **
    Portland, Oregon
    Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    Vladimir B. Belinski, his wife, Svetlana Belinski, and their children,
    Angelina Belinski, Vladimir V. Belinski, Yulia Belinski, and Dennis Belinski
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    (collectively “the Belinskis”) are natives and citizens of Tajikistan and citizens of
    Israel. Their youngest child, Dianna Belinski, is a native and citizen of Canada.
    The Belinskis appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the
    Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of
    removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction
    under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    , and we deny the Belinskis’ petition for review.
    Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that the Belinskis did not
    establish that the Israeli government was unable or unwilling to control their
    alleged persecutors. See Robleto-Pastora v. Holder, 
    567 F.3d 437
    , 442 (9th Cir.
    2009), amended by 
    591 F.3d 1051
     (9th Cir. 2009). We therefore deny the
    Belinskis’ petition for review because the IJ’s decision, affirmed without opinion
    by the Board of Immigration Appeals, is supported by substantial evidence.
    PETITION DENIED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-73761

Citation Numbers: 389 F. App'x 613

Judges: Goodwin, Pregerson, Wardlaw

Filed Date: 7/22/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024