United States v. Thomas Latterell ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              AUG 18 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                         No. 09-30232
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 4:09-CR-00004-SEH
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    THOMAS JOHN LATTERELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted August 13, 2014**
    Before:        SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    Thomas John Latterell appeals from the district court’s judgment following
    his guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a sexual offender under the Sex
    Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), in violation of 18 U.S.C.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    § 2250(a). Latterell challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss
    the indictment. We review de novo. See United States v. Cabrera-Gutierrez, No.
    12-30233, 
    2014 WL 998173
    , at *2 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2014). We have jurisdiction
    under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.
    By letter brief, the government concedes that Latterell’s conviction is infirm
    because it is predicated on interstate travel that occurred in 2006, and Latterell is a
    pre-Act offender who was not obligated to register under SORNA until August 1,
    2008. See Reynolds v. United States, 
    132 S. Ct. 975
    , 984 (2012) (pre-Act
    offenders not required to register before the Attorney General validly specifies that
    the Act’s registration requirements apply to them); United States v. Valverde, 
    628 F.3d 1159
    , 1160 (9th Cir. 2010) (Attorney General’s retroactivity provision
    became effective on August 1, 2008). Accordingly, we remand to the district court
    with instructions to dismiss the indictment against Latterell.
    REVERSED and REMANDED.
    2                                     09-30232
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-30232

Judges: Schroeder, Thomas, Hurwitz

Filed Date: 8/18/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024