Arman Arakelyan v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 471 F. App'x 708 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            MAR 13 2012
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ARMAN ARAKELYAN,                                 No. 08-75222
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A097-877-505
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted March 6, 2012 **
    Before:        B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Arman Arakelyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of
    the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
    removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for substantial evidence the
    agency’s findings of fact, including credibility findings. Tekle v. Mukasey, 
    533 F.3d 1044
    , 1051 (9th Cir. 2008). We grant the petition for review and we remand.
    Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s adverse credibility finding
    because the inconsistencies the BIA identified between Arakelyan’s testimony and
    his documentary evidence regarding the closure of his business and the year his
    nonprofit joined an opposition alliance do not go to the heart of his claim. See
    Singh v. Gonzales, 
    439 F.3d 1100
    , 1106, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2006) (inconsistencies
    in who paid bribe to secure petitioner’s release and number of times petitioner
    transported protesters did not support adverse credibility finding). Accordingly,
    we remand Arakelyan’s asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims on an
    open record for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v.
    Ventura, 
    537 U.S. 12
    , 16-18 (2002) (per curiam); Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 
    555 F.3d 1089
    , 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2009).
    We grant Arakelyan’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney of record.
    The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect that Arakelyan is proceeding pro se.
    The Clerk shall serve this order on Arakelyan at the address provided in counsel’s
    motion to withdraw: 1011 Palmer Ave. #23, Glendale, CA 91205.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
    2                                   08-75222
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-75222

Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 708

Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima

Filed Date: 3/13/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024