Navarro-Soqui v. Holder , 399 F. App'x 166 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                         FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        SEP 13 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                      U.S . CO UR T OF AP PE A LS
    MOISES NAVARRO-SOÏUI, aµa Moises               No. 04-76126
    Navarro aµa Jose Manuel Cota,
    Agency No. A044-776-648
    Petitioner,
    v.                                           ORDER
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    Before: PREGERSON, HALL, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Petitioner's petition for rehearing is hereby GRANTED. The memorandum
    disposition and dissent filed on January 20, 2010, are hereby withdrawn. The new
    memorandum disposition submitted concurrently with this order shall be filed.
    FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              SEP 13 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S . CO UR T OF AP PE A LS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    MOISES NAVARRO-SOÏUI, aµa Moises                 No. 04-76126
    Navarro aµa Jose Manuel Cota,
    Agency No. A044-776-648
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted October 2, 2008**
    Pasadena, California
    Before: PREGERSON, HALL, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    An immigration judge found Moises Navarro-Soqui ('Navarro-Soqui')
    removable as an aggravated felon due to his conviction under Cal. Penal Code y
    288(c)(1) and ordered him removed to Mexico. The Board of Immigration
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
    oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Appeals ('BIA') affirmed the immigration judge and dismissed Navarro-Soqui's
    appeal. Navarro-Soqui petitions this court for review. This Court has jurisdiction
    pursuant to 8 U.S.C. y 1252, and we grant the petition.
    In determining whether a state criminal conviction constitutes an aggravated
    felony under federal law, this court applies the categorical approach set out in
    Taylor v. United States, 
    495 U.S. 575
    , 599-602 (1990). We recently held that
    Cal. Penal Code y 288(c)(1) is not a categorical match with the generic crime of
    sexual abuse of a minor. United States v. Castro, 
    607 F.3d 566
    (9th Cir. 2010).
    Accordingly, Navarro-Soqui's conviction under this statute is not an aggravated
    felony under 8 U.S.C. y 1101(a)(43), and he is not removable under 8 U.S.C. y
    1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).
    We GRANT the petition for review and REMAND to the BIA for further
    proceedings.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-76126

Citation Numbers: 399 F. App'x 166

Judges: Hall, Pregerson, Smith

Filed Date: 9/13/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023