Francine Bailey v. Southwest Montana Drug Task Fo ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             DEC 14 2009
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    FRANCINE E. BAILEY; et al.,                     No. 08-35677
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,           D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00031-RFC-
    CSO
    v.
    DON KELLY,                                      MEMORANDUM *
    Defendant - Appellee
    and
    SOUTHWEST MONTANA DRUG TASK
    FORCE, an Agency of the State of
    Montana; et al.,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Richard F. Cebull, Chief District Judge, Presiding
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    EN/Research
    Submitted November 17, 2009 **
    Before:        ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    Francine E. Bailey and others appeal from the district court’s order
    dismissing as time-barred their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Montana Department of
    Corrections employee Don Kelly. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
    We review de novo the district court’s dismissal based on the statute of limitations,
    Papa v. United States, 
    281 F.3d 1004
    , 1008-09 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.
    The district court properly determined that, because appellants voluntarily
    discontinued their state court case, they were not allowed an additional year to file
    a complaint on the same subject matter. See Mont. Code Ann. § 27-2-204 (2007)
    (extending statute of limitations period for timely state court claims “terminated in
    any other manner than by voluntary discontinuance.”).
    Appellants remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
    All pending motions are denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    **
    The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without
    oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    EN/Research                                2                                   08-35677
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-35677

Judges: Alarcón, Trott, Tashima

Filed Date: 12/14/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024