Isalas Estrada v. Holder ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                                                              FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             DEC 22 2009
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    FAUSTINO ISALAS ESTRADA,                         No. 06-72426
    Petitioner,                        Agency No. A098-177-347
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted December 15, 2009 **
    Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    Faustino Isalas Estrada, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
    of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to continue proceedings.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    LA/Research
    We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for abuse of discretion the
    denial of a motion to continue and review de novo claims of due process
    violations. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 
    526 F.3d 1243
    , 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per
    curiam). We deny the petition for review.
    The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Isalas Estrada’s motion to
    continue because Isalas Estrada did not establish good cause and because the IJ
    granted Isalas Estrada the only relief for which he was eligible. See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1003.29
     (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”);
    Baires v. INS, 
    856 F.2d 89
    , 92-93 (9th Cir. 1988).
    It follows that Isalas Estrada’s due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 
    204 F.3d 1241
    , 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice for a due process
    violation).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    LA/Research                                2                                     06-72426
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-72426

Judges: Alarcón, Trott, Tashima

Filed Date: 12/22/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024