-
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 28 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANA GLORIA AVALOS-ESCALANTE, No. 08-70488 Petitioner, Agency No. A098-432-311 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 15, 2009 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Ana Gloria Avalos-Escalante, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). MVD/Inventory withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,
542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008), and deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because Avalos-Escalante failed to show her alleged persecutors threatened her on account of a protected ground. Her fear of future persecution based on an actual or imputed anti-gang or anti-crime opinion is not on account of the protected ground of either membership in a particular social group or political opinion. See Ramos Barrios v. Holder,
581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009); Santos-Lemus at 745-46; see Ochave v. INS,
254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Asylum generally is not available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled out on account of a protected ground.”) Substantial evidence also supports the Board’s denial of CAT relief based on the Board’s finding that Avalos-Escalante did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the El Salvadoran government. See Arteaga v. Mukasey,
511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir. 2007). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. MVD/Inventory 2 08-70488
Document Info
Docket Number: 08-70488
Citation Numbers: 360 F. App'x 823
Judges: Goodwin, Wallace, Fisher
Filed Date: 12/28/2009
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024