United States v. Francisco Vasquez-Escalante , 108 F.3d 1387 ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • 108 F.3d 1387

    NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Francisco VASQUEZ-ESCALANTE, Defendant-Appellant.

    No. 96-50210.

    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

    Submitted March 11, 1997.*
    Decided March 13, 1997.

    Before: SNEED, LEAVY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

    1

    MEMORANDUM**

    2

    Francisco Vasquez-Escalante appeals the district court's denial of his motion for discovery on the issue of selective prosecution and reinstatement of his conviction. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

    3

    AFFIRMED.

    *

    The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

    **

    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-50210

Citation Numbers: 108 F.3d 1387, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9243

Filed Date: 3/13/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/22/2014