Ruzanna Sargsyan v. Loretta E. Lynch ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    APR 12 2016
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    RUZANNA ASHOT SARGSYAN,                          No. 13-72851
    Petitioner,                        Agency No. A099-589-992
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted April 8, 2016**
    Pasadena, California
    Before: SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and DORSEY,*** District
    Judge.
    Ruzanna Sargsyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of a
    final order of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for
    decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    ***
    The Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey, District States District Judge for
    the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
    review for substantial evidence. Shrestha v. Holder, 
    590 F.3d 1034
    , 1039, 1047-48
    (9th Cir. 2010).
    Sargsyan’s inconsistent testimony about the alleged May 2004 assault and
    subsequent hospitalization provides substantial evidence to support the adverse
    credibility finding. See 
    id. at 1046–47
    (“Although inconsistencies no longer need
    to go to the heart of the petitioner’s claim, when an inconsistency is at the heart of
    the claim it doubtless is of great weight.”). Furthermore, substantial evidence
    supports the finding that Sargsyan did not satisfactorily explain the inconsistencies.
    Nor does the remaining evidence in the record compel a finding that
    Sargsyan more likely than not would be tortured by the government or with its
    acquiescence if she returns to Armenia. See 
    id. at 1048–49
    (If the adverse
    credibility determination is supported by substantial evidence, the remaining
    documents in the record must compel a finding of eligibility for relief under the
    Convention Against Torture).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-72851

Judges: Silverman, Graber, Dorsey

Filed Date: 4/12/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024