United States v. Bruce Cross , 421 F. App'x 720 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 15 2011
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 10-30127
    Plaintiff - Appellee,              D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00002-TMB-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    BRUCE EDWARD CROSS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Alaska
    Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 10, 2011 **
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: FISHER, GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    Bruce Edward Cross appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to
    suppress evidence discovered during an investigatory stop of his vehicle. We
    review the denial of the motion to suppress de novo, and affirm. See United States
    v. Jennen, 
    596 F.3d 594
    , 598 (9th Cir. 2010).
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    “Officers have reasonable suspicion when ‘specific, articulable facts . . .
    together with objective and reasonable inferences, form the basis for suspecting
    that the particular person detained is engaged in criminal activity.’” United States
    v. Choudhry, 
    461 F.3d 1097
    , 1100 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Lopez-
    Soto, 
    205 F.3d 1101
    , 1105 (9th Cir. 2000)). We assess reasonable suspicion in
    light of the totality of the circumstances. See United States v. Montero-Camargo,
    
    208 F.3d 1122
    , 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The totality of the circumstances
    here – including the officer’s training, experience and specific knowledge about the
    woman’s prior arrest, Cross’ location in a known area of prostitution late at night,
    and the woman’s appearance and conduct – gave the officer reasonable suspicion
    to believe the occupants of Cross’ vehicle were engaged in criminal activity
    involving prostitution, thereby justifying the investigatory stop.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-30127

Citation Numbers: 421 F. App'x 720

Judges: Fisher, Gould, Tallman

Filed Date: 3/15/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024