Teresa Luna v. Loretta E. Lynch , 621 F. App'x 400 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            OCT 22 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    TERESA DE JESUS LUNA,                            No. 13-72033
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A099-536-604
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted October 14, 2015**
    Before:        SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
    Teresa de Jesus Luna, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding
    of removal. We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review for
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Ayala v. Holder, 
    640 F.3d 1095
    , 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam). We deny the petition for review.
    Luna testified that she was threatened in El Salvador by a man who had
    caused the death of a member of her family. Substantial evidence supports the
    agency’s determination that Luna failed to meet her burden of showing that she
    suffered past persecution or feared future persecution on account of a protected
    ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 
    555 F.3d 734
    , 740 (9th Cir. 2009)
    (protected ground must be ‘one central reason’ for persecution); Ayala, 
    640 F.3d at 1097
     (even assuming membership in a particular social group, petitioner must
    show persecution on account of membership in that group). Thus, Luna’s asylum
    and withholding of removal claims fail. See Zetino v. Holder, 
    622 F.3d 1007
    ,
    1015-16 (9th Cir. 2010).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                   13-72033
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-72033

Citation Numbers: 621 F. App'x 400

Judges: Silverman, Bybee, Watford

Filed Date: 10/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024