Guadalupe Castillo Pereyra v. United States ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                            FILED
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                               FEB 03 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    GUADALUPE ISABEL CASTILLO                        No. 08-17575
    PEREYRA, surviving spouse of the
    deceased, Juan Pinacho Rodriguez, on             D.C. No. 4:03-cv-00267-JMR
    behalf of herself and Luis Armando
    Pinacho, a minor chid,
    MEMORANDUM *
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Arizona
    John M. Roll, Chief District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted December 9, 2009
    San Francisco, California
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    Guadalupe Isabel Castillo Pereyra and Luis Armando Pinacho (collectively
    Appellants) appeal from the district court’s decision that it lacked jurisdiction over
    Appellants’ wrongful death action.
    If the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act
    applies, the district court correctly determined that it lacked subject matter
    jurisdiction. See Sigman v. United States, 
    217 F.3d 785
    , 793 (9th Cir. 2000), as
    amended. The exception applies if: 1) the government action involves exercise of
    discretion, and 2) the discretion involves “considerations of social, economic, and
    political policy . . .” Alfrey v. United States, 
    276 F.3d 557
    , 561 (9th Cir. 2002)
    (citation omitted). Whether and when to remove an illegal alien from within this
    country’s borders is a matter committed to the sole discretion of immigration
    officials. See Martinez-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 
    366 F.3d 732
    , 735 (9th Cir. 2004).
    Moreover, immigration matters affect core political considerations. See Mercado-
    Zazueta v. Holder, 
    580 F.3d 1102
    , 1112 (9th Cir. 2009). Finally, the INS
    Detention Standard did not “specifically prescribe[ ] a course of action” so as to
    deprive the Border Patrol agents of discretion. 
    Alfrey, 276 F.3d at 561
    (citation
    omitted).
    AFFIRMED.
    Page 2 of 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-17575

Judges: O'Scannlain, Rawlinson, Bea

Filed Date: 2/3/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024